The Book-keepers Forum (BKF)

Post Info TOPIC: Sage problem - VAT on recurring entries


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 180
Date:
Sage problem - VAT on recurring entries
Permalink Closed


I'm in no way a sage expert but a company recently had a VAT inspection and during the course of the inspection it was found to be a problem with the sage recurring entries.

It turns out that when the client switched to the 15% VAT rate last year, instead of creating a new T code (i.e not T1) they just went throught the options and changed T1 to represent 15%, which is fine.  However when they went back to 17.5% at the end of the year it turns out that sage kept calculating the existing recurring entries at 15%.  

I checked another client of mine and all seems fine, however if you have and clients that did this sort of thing it may be worth casting your eye over a couple of the figures.

Also HMRC and in a "cash grabbing" position at the moment.  The above attracted a £250 fine aswell as interest.

Its a multi user sage line 50 package but unsure of the version or any other specifics.  

Just though i'd mention it as it cropped up today and was new to me.  

__________________
Forgive the typo's I generally do not proof read. Just lazy I guess!


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 882
Date:
Permalink Closed

Its interesting to note that even if you have a glitch on a well know and respectable accounts package, its still your fault, although you should check the entries regularly. I wonder if it is a glitch or just the way Sage works ie notes the % when setting up an entry rather than looking at the T code and taking the current status.

Have you been on to Sage? Have they accepted responsibility? Interesting problem...

P

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 180
Date:
Permalink Closed

Not been on to sage and doubt it would do any good. I think the correct procedure is to use another T code and set that up at the new rate and not just change T1. I would dount sage would take any responsibility as I assume they will claim that all figure should be checked before lodgement.

Its not on one of my clients so I will not be follwing this up personally but if i hear any sort of outcome i will pass it on.

Your probably right when you mention its the sage prorgamme rather than the glitch and possible only relivant for transactions set up in the year of change. Prrobably worth checking a few of the entries to be on the safe side.

__________________
Forgive the typo's I generally do not proof read. Just lazy I guess!


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 882
Date:
Permalink Closed

as of course you should be checking your figures and not relying on computers!

P

__________________


Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 1963
Date:
Permalink Closed

I think this probably happens when you save something in Sage, ie I have regualar monthly invoices I send to clients and in invoicing theer is an option to memorise the wording and amount. When we changed to 15%vat, I set this up as T3 and changed all my customers over to T3 and thought that would do the trick when I used the memorised invoices, however they still went to 17.5%. f course same thing happened when it all got changed backto 17.5% (and soon to be 20%!). I suppose this is similar to recurring entries in that the system memorises what the exact transaction was.


__________________
Rob
www.accounts-solutions.com


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1329
Date:
Permalink Closed

I too changed T3 to 15% as I knew it was only going to be temporary. But I think when standard rate goes up to 20% on 4th January I'll change T1 to 20% as Sage defaults to T1 and it would take ages to change transactions to another code for every entry. Then maybe change T6 to 17.5% during transition period when both 20% and 17.5% transactions are coming in/going out.

__________________

Advice from beyond the grave!!!

E&OE

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
©2007-2024 The Book-keepers Forum (BKF). All Rights Reserved. The Book-keepers Forum (BKF) is a trading division of Bookcert Ltd. Registered in England Company Number 05782923. 2 Laurel House, 1 Station Rd, Worle, Weston-super-Mare, North Somerset, BS22 6AR, United Kingdom. The Book-keepers Forum and BKF are trademarks of Bookcert Ltd. This forum is a discussion forum only. There will usually be more than one opinion to any question and any posting should not be viewed as a definitive solution. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any posting on this site is accepted by the contributors or The Book-keepers Forum. In all cases, appropriate professional advice should be sought before making a decision. We reserve the right to remove any postings which are offensive, libellous, self-promoting or engaged in covert marketing. We will not notify users of removals. The views expressed in the forum posts are those of the individual and do not necessary reflect or agree with those of The Book-keepers Forum. Any offensive or unsuitable posts will be removed by the moderators. Any reader of this forum can request for a post to be looked into by sending an email to: bookcertltd@gmail.com.

Privacy & Cookie Policy  About