The Book-keepers Forum (BKF)

Post Info TOPIC: CIS Example test questions


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 59
Date:
CIS Example test questions
Permalink Closed


Hi all

 

Seeking your wonderful advise and help again!!!  xx

 

Have decided to take the step to learn CIS.  I was hoping to find a course i could do but cant seem to find one - not even a webinare or anything

 

So i have asked an accountant i know to set m some sample test questions to work on

I understand the principles of how to raise a CIS invoice eg

 

Labour 300

Material 75

Total 375

Vat on that 75

New Total 450

20 % CIS on labour only 50

Customer pays 400

 

However i have been set a test example that im struggling with and need sone guidance in the right direction

 

EG the Subcontractor is a ltd company and the contractor issues him a weekly payment slip

 

Gross Taxable 1669.84

Tax  333.96

VAT 25.55

Total paid to him 1361.43

 

and to be honest im totally confused as i cant make that work with the above example at all :(

and would at least like to have a small grasp of what the hell its all about before asking the accountant - as id like the accountant to issue me more examples so i can learn given there seems to be no actual CIS course to do and given hes been kind enough to set some tests i dont want to take up the time he is giving FOC on just one example - id at least like to have some understanding first so he will be willing to give me some more examples

Could someone point me in the right direction pretty pretty please ? im wondering if there is a trick in the question im not seeing??

 

By the way more than happy to post all examples if they help others!!!

 

Thanking you all in advance !!!!!!!!

 



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 59
Date:
Permalink Closed

sorry should add sub contractor is a vat reg ltd company !!!!

__________________


Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 8646
Date:
Permalink Closed

Not got a second spare to check this at the mo, will look at it later unless someone beats me to it.



-- Edited by Cheshire on Friday 18th of August 2017 07:03:48 PM

__________________

 Joanne 

Winner of Bookkeeper of the Year 2015, 2016 & 2017 

Thoughts are my own/not to be regarded as official advice,which should be sought from a suitably qualified Accountant.

You should check out answers with reference to the legal position



Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 3904
Date:
Permalink Closed

Gail72 wrote:

Labour 300

Material 75

Total 375

Vat on that 75

New Total 450

20 % CIS on labour only 50

Customer pays 400

You should revisit this, the CIS deduction isn't £50

 

However i have been set a test example that im struggling with and need sone guidance in the right direction

 

EG the Subcontractor is a ltd company and the contractor issues him a weekly payment slip

 

Gross Taxable 1669.84

Tax  333.96

VAT 25.55

Total paid to him 1361.43

 

and to be honest im totally confused as i cant make that work with the above example at all :(

and would at least like to have a small grasp of what the hell its all about before asking the accountant - as id like the accountant to issue me more examples so i can learn given there seems to be no actual CIS course to do and given hes been kind enough to set some tests i dont want to take up the time he is giving FOC on just one example - id at least like to have some understanding first so he will be willing to give me some more examples

Could someone point me in the right direction pretty pretty please ? im wondering if there is a trick in the question im not seeing??


Hi Gail

On the first example, the CIS tax isn't £50 

On the second example, the VAT is woefully wrong.  It should be the same as the CIS Tax

Is it that the £1669.84 includes VAT?  I can't get it exact but if that's the case, calculate the VAT as 1/6th of the total, in this case £278.31

So the calculation should be

Labour  £1391.53

+ VAT £278.31

Total £1669.84

- CIS deduction £278.31

Subby gets £1391.53

Just to advise that the 20% CIS is only if the subby has been verified.  If not the deduction would be 30%

 

 

 



__________________

John 

 

 

 Any advice given is for general guidance and professional advice should be sought applicable to your circumstances.



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 59
Date:
Permalink Closed

Thanks John ... sorry yes re 1st eg should be 60 cis tax so customer pays £390 ..... head was alittle frazzled by the 2nd eg i didnt undersstand

In the 2nd example it is definately shown as

Gross Taxable 1669.84

Tax 333.96

VAT 25.55

Total Payments 1669.84

Total Deductions 359.51  (The total deductions 333.96 and 25.55 come to the total dedcutions figure 359.51)

Net Payable 1361.43

But the total Payments less dedcutions equals 1310.33 which is 51.10 difference - which happens to be 2 lots of 25.55??


The gross taxable figure was given as a calculation of 5 figures which do total 1669.84

1146.79
208.32
186.96
42.97
84.80


25.55 vat would mean 127.75/25.55

So does that mean the 42.97 and 84.80 figures are involved in the 25.55 vat as they total 127.77 ????

Am i getting close or am i going way off track ?????



-- Edited by Gail72 on Friday 18th of August 2017 01:06:36 PM



-- Edited by Gail72 on Friday 18th of August 2017 01:37:00 PM

__________________


Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 3904
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi Gail

I'm puzzled as to why only two of the amounts are subject to VAT?  Is there anything in the Accountant's question to clarify it?

However, based on the question as it stands 

Gross Taxable 1669.84

+ VAT 25.55  

Total £1695.39

- CIS 333.96

Net payable £1361.43

 

The mistake you are making is deducting the VAT instead of adding it on.

 



__________________

John 

 

 

 Any advice given is for general guidance and professional advice should be sought applicable to your circumstances.



Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 8646
Date:
Permalink Closed

Looks like you are using the vat fractoin in the first £50 instead of £60, so its about knowing what percentages/fraction type calculations to do.

Can I suggest you post the actual question as a screen shot as I often see that there is something missing when its just typed out. You can redact any private info.

__________________

 Joanne 

Winner of Bookkeeper of the Year 2015, 2016 & 2017 

Thoughts are my own/not to be regarded as official advice,which should be sought from a suitably qualified Accountant.

You should check out answers with reference to the legal position



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 17
Date:
Permalink Closed

Leger wrote:

Hi Gail

I'm puzzled as to why only two of the amounts are subject to VAT?  Is there anything in the Accountant's question to clarify it?

 


 Zero rated work and standard rated no doubt.

New build house exempt

Garden wall standard rated.

 

Edited to change zero rated to exempt



-- Edited by AlbaBeanCounter on Friday 18th of August 2017 07:59:13 PM

__________________

Martin (Tomo) Thomson

 



Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 8646
Date:
Permalink Closed

AlbaBeanCounter wrote:
Leger wrote:

Hi Gail

I'm puzzled as to why only two of the amounts are subject to VAT?  Is there anything in the Accountant's question to clarify it?

 


 Zero rated work and standard rated no doubt.

New build house exempt

Garden wall standard rated.

 

Edited to change zero rated to exempt



-- Edited by AlbaBeanCounter on Friday 18th of August 2017 07:59:13 PM


Ahhhh Tomo - which is it? Zero or exempt?

Agree that there can be a mix of VAT rates, even 5%.



__________________

 Joanne 

Winner of Bookkeeper of the Year 2015, 2016 & 2017 

Thoughts are my own/not to be regarded as official advice,which should be sought from a suitably qualified Accountant.

You should check out answers with reference to the legal position



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1313
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi all

I thought that new builds were Zero rated

Agree that this is where the problem with the VAT amount shown in the question set by the accountant lies as in the different rates, but should it not have shown what VAT rates were being applied to each amount on the Invoice?

Be nice to see what Joanne asked for, the actual layout of the question



__________________

Doug

These are only my opinions of how I see things and therefore should not be taken as advice



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 17
Date:
Permalink Closed

Cheshire wrote:
AlbaBeanCounter wrote:
Leger wrote:

Hi Gail

I'm puzzled as to why only two of the amounts are subject to VAT?  Is there anything in the Accountant's question to clarify it?

 


 Zero rated work and standard rated no doubt.

New build house exempt

Garden wall standard rated.

 

Edited to change zero rated to exempt



-- Edited by AlbaBeanCounter on Friday 18th of August 2017 07:59:13 PM


Ahhhh Tomo - which is it? Zero or exempt?

Agree that there can be a mix of VAT rates, even 5%.


 I was right first time... New builds are zero rated. Sure materials for structure would be exempt... Will have to have a wee refresher.... VAT so exciting



__________________

Martin (Tomo) Thomson

 



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 59
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi all, Thank you so much for the input - the accountant simply gave me a payslip format to work it out from. I suspect the account has put dummy name in etc but as it's not the typical Joe Bloggs people tend to use I will blank that out first .....never attached anything on this site before so bear with while I figure it out!!! Xx

__________________


Forum Moderator & Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 11981
Date:
Permalink Closed

Advanced Editor

Attach files

find the file that you want to attach and click open

once its been attached you can insert it into the body of the message simply by hitting Insert next to the image

 

HTH,

Shaun.



__________________

Shaun

Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.



Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 8646
Date:
Permalink Closed

AlbaBeanCounter wrote:


 I was right first time... New builds are zero rated. Sure materials for structure would be exempt... Will have to have a wee refresher.... VAT so exciting


Follow the money!  OK I was thinking of the recent TV program of that name, but follow the build (generally).

Sounds like you may consider specilising if you love VAT so much.

Have you waded through the actual act yet?  Now that would send most folk to sleep when they have insomnia!



__________________

 Joanne 

Winner of Bookkeeper of the Year 2015, 2016 & 2017 

Thoughts are my own/not to be regarded as official advice,which should be sought from a suitably qualified Accountant.

You should check out answers with reference to the legal position



Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 8646
Date:
Permalink Closed

Shamus wrote:

Advanced Editor

Attach files

find the file that you want to attach and click open

once its been attached you can insert it into the body of the message simply by hitting Insert next to the image

 

HTH,

Shaun.


Hi Gail

Are you accessing the site from a PC?   

Just to add to Shaun's note, advanced editor is one of the options at the bottom of the 'quick answer' reply option.   You cannot get to it when doing a 'quote' type response as far as Im aware and you probably will not see the option if you are on a mobile phone.

Use 'Paint' software to redact any info, save as a picture and job sorted ready for upload.



-- Edited by Cheshire on Monday 21st of August 2017 06:20:27 AM

__________________

 Joanne 

Winner of Bookkeeper of the Year 2015, 2016 & 2017 

Thoughts are my own/not to be regarded as official advice,which should be sought from a suitably qualified Accountant.

You should check out answers with reference to the legal position



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 17
Date:
Permalink Closed

Cheshire wrote:
AlbaBeanCounter wrote:


 I was right first time... New builds are zero rated. Sure materials for structure would be exempt... Will have to have a wee refresher.... VAT so exciting


Follow the money!  OK I was thinking of the recent TV program of that name, but follow the build (generally).

Sounds like you may consider specilising if you love VAT so much.

Have you waded through the actual act yet?  Now that would send most folk to sleep when they have insomnia!


I haven't looked at the actual act, as to specialising... One area I do expect to specialise would be construction companies. I grew up surrounded by brickies and labourers and my father was a contractor (brick and block work). I used to help him with is VAT, Tax and CIS. (He was a great educator) That's what drove me to further educate myself.



__________________

Martin (Tomo) Thomson

 



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 252
Date:
Permalink Closed

You are confusing me and I work for a construction company and deal with CIS every day.

Are you sure the accountant knows what he is doing? (Some accountants are rubbish with CIS)

Is the gross taxable figure the amount the subcontractor was actually paid and so you are working backwards? Is that amount including VAT? IS their CIS status a standard 20%? IS the entire figure labour only or are there any materials? Why are you working backwards?






__________________

Julie



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 59
Date:
Permalink Closed

Here goes and i have checked - this was an actual client payslip and they received £1361.43

 
Payments


C - Plot Vinyl 1146.79
E- Plot Screed 208.32
H- Plot Carpet 186.96
I - Uplift & Dispose 42.97
K - Extras 84.80

 

Gross Taxable 1669.84

Tax @ 20% 333.96

VAT 25.55

Total Payments1669.84

Total Deductions 359.51

Net Payable    1361.43

 

 



-- Edited by Gail72 on Monday 21st of August 2017 02:31:40 PM



-- Edited by Gail72 on Monday 21st of August 2017 02:32:27 PM

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 252
Date:
Permalink Closed

Firstly whoever made out that payslip needs to learn the rules of rounding (1669.84 times 20% CIS deduction equals £333.968 which should be rounded up to £333.97

And that VAT figure surely must be wrong.

You don't deduct VAT from someone you pay, you add it on and they pay it over to HMRC.

__________________

Julie



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 252
Date:
Permalink Closed

If I received a bill for labour from a subbie I'd itemise it like this:

Total labour figure £1,669.84

Plus 20% VAT £333.97

Minus 20% CIS deduction £333.97

Total payable to subbie £1,335.87

__________________

Julie



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1313
Date:
Permalink Closed

pictures wrote:

If I received a bill for labour from a subbie I'd itemise it like this:

Total labour figure £1,669.84

Plus 20% VAT £333.97

Minus 20% CIS deduction £333.97

Total payable to subbie £1,335.87


Totally agree with what Julie says about a subbie payment

Why is the VAT figure £25.55 it can only be from the figures of £42.97 and £84.80 plus 20% VAT but if this is the case why has it been deducted and not added on and why only charged on these figures and not the rest.

Might be good to look at the Invoice as I always thought that Carpet fitting is excluded from CIS 

 



__________________

Doug

These are only my opinions of how I see things and therefore should not be taken as advice



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 59
Date:
Permalink Closed

There is no invoice raised! that is my test!! - raise the invoice and record how to post it on account software etc

This is the payslip the contractor has given the ltd company subbie

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1313
Date:
Permalink Closed

Artois wrote:

 


 


Might be good to look at the Invoice as I always thought that Carpet fitting is excluded from CIS 


 I stand corrected on this, I just looked into it in more detail and it seems that although carpet fitting is excluded from CIS because it appears on the same Invoice and I would assume part of the same job it does in fact become liable to a deduction under CIS 



__________________

Doug

These are only my opinions of how I see things and therefore should not be taken as advice



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1313
Date:
Permalink Closed

Gail72 wrote:

There is no invoice raised! that is my test!! - raise the invoice and record how to post it on account software etc

This is the payslip the contractor has given the ltd company subbie


 So this is just a made up payslip?

Maybe I'm just being thick but I cant see how this payslip can be correct 



__________________

Doug

These are only my opinions of how I see things and therefore should not be taken as advice



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 252
Date:
Permalink Closed

But you are doing it backwards. Its the subbies job to raise the invoice, not the contractors. The subbie charges the VAT and the contractor deducts the CIS. Why is the accountant giving you this test when its irrelevant.

the subbie should send an invoice reading something like this

For labour provided as detailed:

Plot Vinyl 1146.79
Plot Screed 208.32
Plot Carpet 186.96
Uplift & Dispose 42.97
Extras 84.80


Nett Total £1,669.84

VAT at 20% £333.97

Total Payable £2,003.80

The contractor should then verify the contractor and deduct 20% on the net figure. The statement of deductions should read something like this:


Total gross amount (less VAT) £1,669.84

Less Materials £0.00

Amount liable for deductions £1,669.84

Total tax deducted £333.97


The contractor then pays the subcontractor £1,669.84 which is broken down as detailed in my post above.

This is of course assuming all items are Vatable and subject to CIS but the onus would be on the subbie to itemise VAT rates and non deductible items (for example of an invoice was for commissioning only, no installation)

__________________

Julie



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 252
Date:
Permalink Closed

Are any of those items listed materials? Eg I've read plot vinyl as the subbie plotting where to put the vinyl on a plan or something but if the vinyl and carpet are materials he provided that changes all the figures.

__________________

Julie



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1313
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi Gail

I don't see how you can raise an Invoice if the only information you have is contained on the payslip you posted.

You need the information on the Invoice to get the payslip otherwise it will be just guesswork maybe the accountant should have provided you with the Invoice and asked you to do the payslip with the CIS deductions 

Hi Julie

Agree with what you say about the materials changing all the figures but as I said above its impossible to say without the actual Invoice or further information but it seems that 20% CIS deduction has been charged on the total figure 



__________________

Doug

These are only my opinions of how I see things and therefore should not be taken as advice



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 59
Date:
Permalink Closed

What the accountant has asked me to do is create the posting entries needed for the subbie ltd company accounts and vat return

Am feeling really deflated as so wanted to learn

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1313
Date:
Permalink Closed

Gail72 wrote:

What the accountant has asked me to do is create the posting entries needed for the subbie ltd company accounts and vat return

Am feeling really deflated as so wanted to learn


 Hi Gail

I wouldn't feel deflated as it is not just you there has been a number of us who have looked at the payslip and no one has been able to come up with an answer as to how the figures you posted work out, maybe someone will come on later today and be able to give you an answer but if not I don't think there is any shame in going back to the accountant and asking how these figures came about as that's all part of the learning being able to actually ask someone when you don't know the answer and listening to the explanation given. 

Sorry for not being able to offer more help.



__________________

Doug

These are only my opinions of how I see things and therefore should not be taken as advice



Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 3904
Date:
Permalink Closed

Artois wrote:

 Hi Gail

I wouldn't feel deflated as it is not just you there has been a number of us who have looked at the payslip and no one has been able to come up with an answer as to how the figures you posted work out, 


 I gave Gail the correct answer upthread. The mistake she had made was to deduct the VAT from the invoice rather than adding it.

 

Edit:  Got my names mixed up, sorry



-- Edited by Leger on Tuesday 22nd of August 2017 12:10:27 AM

__________________

John 

 

 

 Any advice given is for general guidance and professional advice should be sought applicable to your circumstances.



Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 3904
Date:
Permalink Closed

pictures wrote:

If I received a bill for labour from a subbie I'd itemise it like this:

Total labour figure £1,669.84

Plus 20% VAT £333.97

Minus 20% CIS deduction £333.97

Total payable to subbie £1,335.87


 You'd have a very irate subby on your back   smile

He should be getting £1669.84  

 

I agree about the rounding error on the VAT 



__________________

John 

 

 

 Any advice given is for general guidance and professional advice should be sought applicable to your circumstances.



Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 3904
Date:
Permalink Closed

Gail72 wrote:

What the accountant has asked me to do is create the posting entries needed for the subbie ltd company accounts and vat return

Am feeling really deflated as so wanted to learn


 To be fair, I think we all got confused because that's not what you asked in your original post.

So lets do the task.

First raise a purchase ledger entry for Mr Subby.

£1669.84 + 25.55 VAT coded to Cost of sales - Subcontractors  (VAT box may show £333.97 but you should be able to overwrite that) 

then do a purchase ledger credit for £333.96 coded to Creditors - CIS Tax or HMRC CIS. 

Then pay Mr Subby 1361.43  You can see from the attached screenshot what the purchase ledger account looks like and on the left hand side you can see where the entries have gone to in the accounts (second screenshot is so you can see the subcontractor entry)

When the CIS is paid over to HMRC you would record £333.96 in the bank account coded to the creditors CIS and this will make that entry zero.

 

Please ask me to clarify further if theres anything you dont understand.

 

Edited to add screenshots 



-- Edited by Leger on Tuesday 22nd of August 2017 12:31:54 AM

Attachments
__________________

John 

 

 

 Any advice given is for general guidance and professional advice should be sought applicable to your circumstances.



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 252
Date:
Permalink Closed

Leger wrote:
pictures wrote:

If I received a bill for labour from a subbie I'd itemise it like this:

Total labour figure £1,669.84

Plus 20% VAT £333.97

Minus 20% CIS deduction £333.97

Total payable to subbie £1,335.87


 You'd have a very irate subby on your back   smile

He should be getting £1669.84  

 

I agree about the rounding error on the VAT 


 

Oops! That's what happens when you copy and paste the wrong figures!

 

 



__________________

Julie



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 59
Date:
Permalink Closed

Thanks so much everyone xx Plan is to sit down this afternoon with a large cup of coffee and that attitude "I can learn this" make sure I understand what has been posted on here and do another of the tests accountants gave me and post and hopeful I will post the right answers!!! Here's hoping!!! Then if I get that right reward myself with wine instead of coffee!! I spoke to the accountant today and he said reason he gave me the payslip example is he felt I was trying to learn it too text book like and life is never as some as here's the labour here's the materials etc ...he said very often the subbie will just pass over the payslip from the contractor and left to bookkeeper/accountant to record in accounts correctly

__________________


Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 8646
Date:
Permalink Closed

Gail72 wrote:

 I spoke to the accountant today and he said reason he gave me the payslip example is he felt I was trying to learn it too text book like and life is never as some as here's the labour here's the materials etc ...he said very often the subbie will just pass over the payslip from the contractor and left to bookkeeper/accountant to record in accounts correctly


Thats all well and good but any GOOD trainer, whether a formally qualified one or just acting in a mentor capacity, knows the best way to explain things to a student is to work through straight forward structured examples,adding complexity as they go and work you up to fully complex transacations.   On the basis you got the first one wrong I think he may well be doing you a diservice and not aiding your correct training by doing things in such a way at this juncture.

I do think he is right in giving you real world stuff, of course. BUT I disagree with the approach in terms of training but also on the basis of the notion of recording such 'correctly' when you are only getting a one sided version and that version is not from YOUR client, ie the one who you should be protecting from himself, HMRC and dodgy contractors, rather than accepting the word of the contractor that this payslip is correct.  

Someone should be challenging the idiot contractors and sub contractors who present such paperwork - ie that is the bookkeeper/Accountants role.  

Now if the said Accountant has done this then fair enough, but you indicated that the second example was a real case so we can only surmise that this has not been challenged.  You cannot just accept that the VAT is correct  and should find out why this has so little VAT included.  He should have the answers and it may well be correct, but as part of your learning he should now be able to supply the actual information in full so you understand it fully, clearly worringly he has yet to do that, unless of course at this stage, he is still waiting for your answer and/or any challenging questions.  

He should, as above,  also be encouraging his client to raise a proper invoice in the first place - self billing from contractors is not the correct way to go and is not acceptable in this area.   Besides we all know that such payslips can actually represent more than one invoice and may be (and very often are) wrong.  Contractors will always challenge subbies bills and often their payments bear no resemblance to the actual debt due. So the lack of information from a subbie to a contractor is of concern and corrective action MUST be encouraged - how else can you justify ANY of it in the event of an HMRC inspection - not just for CIS purposes but VAT and S/A tax or CT.

To be clar - Im not saying all contractors are bad. Ive seen some dreadful paperwork and attempts by subbies to extract more cash than is due. But that is the whole point of having the 'story' from both sides, which will be discovered and corrected as you process the transactions. The there or thereabouts method of Accountancy doesnt work at the best of times, but especially so in the CIS arena!

Just to add to John's fab explanation of processing the entries - I would list each of the VAT rated items separetely in the software (one PI, several entries) once, of course, the correct VAT status and amounts have been ascertained.  Easier when looking back if HMRC do visit!

Of course part of the confusion with the 'incorrect' deductions earlier may well have been a typo - we dont know without the actual question/'evidence' supplied by the accountant being included as a picture or pdf - so I would encourage such such in the future that might help folk formulating their answers.

Also perhaps look at some examples yourself via the HMRC CIS pdf helpfile - there are at least half a dozen or so with different situations to work through.

 

 



-- Edited by Cheshire on Tuesday 22nd of August 2017 02:19:11 PM

__________________

 Joanne 

Winner of Bookkeeper of the Year 2015, 2016 & 2017 

Thoughts are my own/not to be regarded as official advice,which should be sought from a suitably qualified Accountant.

You should check out answers with reference to the legal position



Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 3904
Date:
Permalink Closed

I couldn't agree with you more Joanne and thanks for giving a much bigger picture surrounding CIS.

Fair point about listing the zero and standard rated VAT items separately.



__________________

John 

 

 

 Any advice given is for general guidance and professional advice should be sought applicable to your circumstances.



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 252
Date:
Permalink Closed

I'd been trying to think how to compose a reply but Joanne has put it so much more eloquently than I could. The accountant is doing you a dis-service , straight forward examples followed by more complicated ones definitely.

I'm from the other side. I work for a ltd company main contractor. Quite frankly if one of our many subbies presented me with that level of information they would not get paid - end of. We have on occasion assisted a small sub-contractor to produce his own invoices (by giving them a template and assisting them as to what figures to put in). Also from the other side, a contractor is legally obliged to produce a Statement of Deductions to a sub-contractor each month to assist with their accounts.

So called Payslips give the impression of employment, not self-employment. The accountant is giving you the impression that this type of paperwork is normal and acceptable, it isn't and as Joanne said, it won't stand up to an HMRC inspection. When we were last inspected HMRC wanted to know how we knew that what the subbies were invoicing was correct and they were very suspicious of any labour only subbies (luckily we have very, very few of these and those that are were very short term or highly specialist areas).

My company also sub-contract to much larger contractors and I can't tell you the number of times that their Payment Certificates to us (we do have formal self-billing arrangements with some, they have to be administered in a particular way and renewed annually) have been incorrect for one reason or another.

So don't feel downhearted. (And have that wine)

__________________

Julie



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 59
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi all

Julie - the accountant said that in this case the contrator gives the subbie this payslip and pays him the amount

Joanne - there is no snap shot to send as the account sent it in email body and i have copied and pasted as i received it (without the dummy name etc) and yes he is still waiting me to answer

John - i am am confused as the subbie has already been paid .... and wouldnt it be sales invoice and credit note?



-- Edited by Gail72 on Tuesday 22nd of August 2017 02:24:51 PM

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 59
Date:
Permalink Closed

So in this case to start the bookkeeper would have a £1361.43 bank receipt on bank statement and this payslip info

__________________


Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 8646
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi Gail
I think the problem is, in part, that we seem to be getting the info piecemeal. (extra info at 21/8 14.29 to 18/8 @15.33, but presumable on the back of the piecemeal way it is being fed to you). In addition when you mentioned the payslip in the 21/8 version it was assumed that you had seen the payslip. That information contains errors (total deductions being the one that has caused most of the confusion, along with the VAT rate, which we think we know what it attaches to, but need clarification.

So - is my understanding that you are looking at the CIS from a subbies point of view and he is supplying services to the contractor? I dont think this was said at the outset, unless Ive missed it in my usual habit of scan reading. John usually works with contractors so hence his take on it. So if its the former you would be correct - it would need a sales invoice.

But remember you need to get that 'sales invoice' from your client.    Before that I think you should go back and ask about the VAT situation.    



-- Edited by Cheshire on Tuesday 22nd of August 2017 02:43:07 PM

__________________

 Joanne 

Winner of Bookkeeper of the Year 2015, 2016 & 2017 

Thoughts are my own/not to be regarded as official advice,which should be sought from a suitably qualified Accountant.

You should check out answers with reference to the legal position



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 252
Date:
Permalink Closed

Well Gail, I wouldn't like to be that contractor in the case of an HMRC inspection. And none of this helps you to learn the correct procedure so that you, in the future can advise your clients on the proper way of doing things.

__________________

Julie



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 59
Date:
Permalink Closed

I have just checked with the accountant and this example is all labour

Therefore i would have expected it to be

Labour 1669.84

Materials 0.00

Total Before Vat 1669.84

VAT @ 20% 333.97

Total before CIS 2003.81

CIS @ 20% Labour 333.97

Total payable by contractor 1669.84

I know because i havent got back to the 1361.43 that the subbie has been paid ive gone wrong All i know is the 308.41 difference is the 333.96 tax @20% on payslip less the 25.55 vat on payslip

I could cry


__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 59
Date:
Permalink Closed

i did say in my very first post

EG the Subcontractor is a ltd company and the contractor issues him a weekly payment slip

__________________


Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 8646
Date:
Permalink Closed

pictures wrote:

I'd been trying to think how to compose a reply but Joanne has put it so much more eloquently than I could. The accountant is doing you a dis-service , straight forward examples followed by more complicated ones definitely.

I'm from the other side. I work for a ltd company main contractor. Quite frankly if one of our many subbies presented me with that level of information they would not get paid - end of. We have on occasion assisted a small sub-contractor to produce his own invoices (by giving them a template and assisting them as to what figures to put in). Also from the other side, a contractor is legally obliged to produce a Statement of Deductions to a sub-contractor each month to assist with their accounts.

So called Payslips give the impression of employment, not self-employment. The accountant is giving you the impression that this type of paperwork is normal and acceptable, it isn't and as Joanne said, it won't stand up to an HMRC inspection. When we were last inspected HMRC wanted to know how we knew that what the subbies were invoicing was correct and they were very suspicious of any labour only subbies (luckily we have very, very few of these and those that are were very short term or highly specialist areas).

My company also sub-contract to much larger contractors and I can't tell you the number of times that their Payment Certificates to us (we do have formal self-billing arrangements with some, they have to be administered in a particular way and renewed annually) have been incorrect for one reason or another.

So don't feel downhearted. (And have that wine)


Hi Julie

Sorry, hope I wasnt coming across as implying all contractors are 'dodgy' as Ive worked with some corking ones and its pretty obvious that you know what you are doing. I have, as I indicated seen some dodgy subby stuff going on....like purchasing tools and billing contractors, just as one eg.  Ive also worked with formal self billing - as you say, special rules to follow and such who do it are (usually) pretty hot on their admin and such.   Totally agree on the IR35 issue - lack of 'encouraging' subbies to bill properly means storing this problem one up for later, especially where s/e!

Think we should all just a few bottles of wine!

Keep going Gail - will get there in the end, although Im thinking perhaps you might be better getting some test examples from the guys on here, if they are willing.



-- Edited by Cheshire on Tuesday 22nd of August 2017 03:01:17 PM

__________________

 Joanne 

Winner of Bookkeeper of the Year 2015, 2016 & 2017 

Thoughts are my own/not to be regarded as official advice,which should be sought from a suitably qualified Accountant.

You should check out answers with reference to the legal position



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1313
Date:
Permalink Closed

Leger wrote:
Artois wrote:

 Hi Gail

I wouldn't feel deflated as it is not just you there has been a number of us who have looked at the payslip and no one has been able to come up with an answer as to how the figures you posted work out, 


 I gave Gail the correct answer upthread. The mistake she had made was to deduct the VAT from the invoice rather than adding it.

Hi John

Sorry I have done you a disservice there but what I wrote does not quite read as it sounded in my head, yes you did give Gail the correct answer but I was talking more about how the VAT figure came about after Gail said part of her test was to raise the Invoice.

Hi Gail 

The Bookkeeper would also have the Invoice, which would be needed for the VAT return

 


 



-- Edited by Artois on Tuesday 22nd of August 2017 02:53:23 PM

__________________

Doug

These are only my opinions of how I see things and therefore should not be taken as advice



Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 8646
Date:
Permalink Closed

Gail72 wrote:

i did say in my very first post

EG the Subcontractor is a ltd company and the contractor issues him a weekly payment slip


 Apologies - I must read things fully and slowly!   I did in fact assume sales invoice in my response at first then clocked on to John's PI in his piccies! (Blame Johnwinkwink.......lol, no I dont, easily done!!) 



__________________

 Joanne 

Winner of Bookkeeper of the Year 2015, 2016 & 2017 

Thoughts are my own/not to be regarded as official advice,which should be sought from a suitably qualified Accountant.

You should check out answers with reference to the legal position



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 252
Date:
Permalink Closed

Gail, your figures are exactly the figures I come to. You cannot possibly be expected to get to the so called "correct" figure without knowing why the amount of VAT is not the standard 20%.

In a real life situation you would say to your client, the VAT seems wrong, you need to check why. If I wasn't told otherwise I would assume someone (main contractor perhaps) has made an error in the calculation.



__________________

Julie



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 59
Date:
Permalink Closed

God dont apologise ... im the idiot not you

So am i sort of getting there? if this example is all labour which apparently it is should it not be


Labour 1669.84

Materials 0.00

Total Before Vat 1669.84

VAT @ 20% 333.97

Total before CIS 2003.81

CIS @ 20% Labour 333.97

Total payable by contractor 1669.84

and basically there is a total balls up re the £308.41 difference which is not my misunderstanding????? - im so hoping!!!!

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 59
Date:
Permalink Closed

Sorry Julie i wasnt ignoring your answer - when i got the info from accountant it was all labour i came away from here so didnt refer and worked it out how i understood it - and came up with same as you!!!!!!!!!!!!

So im sort of getting it yes???

__________________


Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 8646
Date:
Permalink Closed

Gail72 wrote:

I have just checked with the accountant and this example is all labour

Therefore i would have expected it to be

Labour 1669.84

Materials 0.00

Total Before Vat 1669.84

VAT @ 20% 333.97

Total before CIS 2003.81

CIS @ 20% Labour 333.97

Total payable by contractor 1669.84

I know because i havent got back to the 1361.43 that the subbie has been paid ive gone wrong All i know is the 308.41 difference is the 333.96 tax @20% on payslip less the 25.55 vat on payslip

I could cry


 

Can we all just stop a minute?  Am I going bonkers - no VAT because its all labour!!  

Doug, John, Julie - please correct me or confirm - there should be VAT on labour if the subbie is VAT registered, UNLESS there its relating to certain types of build?    

Gail - do you know what was being 'built' in this scenario?



-- Edited by Cheshire on Tuesday 22nd of August 2017 03:05:54 PM

__________________

 Joanne 

Winner of Bookkeeper of the Year 2015, 2016 & 2017 

Thoughts are my own/not to be regarded as official advice,which should be sought from a suitably qualified Accountant.

You should check out answers with reference to the legal position

1 2  >  Last»  | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
©2007-2024 The Book-keepers Forum (BKF). All Rights Reserved. The Book-keepers Forum (BKF) is a trading division of Bookcert Ltd. Registered in England Company Number 05782923. 2 Laurel House, 1 Station Rd, Worle, Weston-super-Mare, North Somerset, BS22 6AR, United Kingdom. The Book-keepers Forum and BKF are trademarks of Bookcert Ltd. This forum is a discussion forum only. There will usually be more than one opinion to any question and any posting should not be viewed as a definitive solution. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any posting on this site is accepted by the contributors or The Book-keepers Forum. In all cases, appropriate professional advice should be sought before making a decision. We reserve the right to remove any postings which are offensive, libellous, self-promoting or engaged in covert marketing. We will not notify users of removals. The views expressed in the forum posts are those of the individual and do not necessary reflect or agree with those of The Book-keepers Forum. Any offensive or unsuitable posts will be removed by the moderators. Any reader of this forum can request for a post to be looked into by sending an email to: bookcertltd@gmail.com.

Privacy & Cookie Policy  About